Winnipeg police beating caught on video
Posted January 29, 2010 in News
Yesterday, a video was presented in court showing Winnipeg police officers beating a man in a parking lot in downtown Winnipeg almost a year ago. CBC says the video shows four officers pinning the man to the ground, while others kick, knee, and punch him, as well as taser him twice. The police earlier claimed the man had resisted arrest, but there was no evidence of this in the video.
His lawyer, Dan Manning, is quoted as saying that when he saw him the next morning, “I honestly did not recognize him. His face was swollen to twice its normal size. His eyes were black. There was blood around his face — dried blood.”
One of the officers involved is Ryan Law, Police Chief Keith McCaskill’s nephew, who is already facing a lawsuit around a separate incident where a man in custody ended up bleeding from his mouth, nose, and rectum, and required treatment for a ruptured colon.
This recording is yet another demonstration of the importance of the right to observe and record police interactions, a right that Chief McCaskill has refused to acknowledge, and that Winnipeg Police Service officers have repeatedly violated. Winnipeg Copwatch will continue to fight for people’s right to observe and record the police, and for police accountability.
This incident is also representative of a pattern Winnipeg Copwatch has observed in violent arrests. Whenever a violent arrest is made, there will almost certainly be accusations or charges laid for resisting arrest or assaulting the police. Often, evidence surfaces showing no resistance on the part of the person being arrested. We can only understand this to show that police use the charges and accusations to justify the violence of their arrests, and to tie people up defending themselves against criminal charges instead of pursuing the police for their abuse.
Family, friends, and supporters have raised the profile of 
to ‘an offence that combines the components of assault with circumstances of a sexual nature where the suspect is not known to the victim’ (emphasis added) from the definition based on the Criminal Code which includes sexual assaults where the suspect is known or unknown to the victim. Over 78% of assault in Winnipeg is perpetrated by a suspect known to the victim (Statistic found in ‘Mean Streets?’ Comak, Chopyk and Wood, p.7). This definition change is not in line with Crimestat’s stated principles of disseminating accurate information and promoting transparency and accountability. Winnipeg is the only Canadian city which reports on sexual assaults in this way (As reported by Gabrielle Giroday in the article “ Board wants police website to report all sexual assaults” in the Winnipeg Free Press, May 29, 2009)
Saturday, June 6th, 2009 at Kildonan Park (South Picnic Shelter)
Winnipeg Copwatch is discouraged to hear of another case of Winnipeg police illegally seizing video equipment. Local media have reported the seizure on Wednesday of
Roanna Hepburn is a resident of Winnipeg, community activist, grandmother and great grandmother currently campaigning the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba for a full and independent investigation into an act of violence committed against her granddaughter by members of the Winnipeg Police Service.